<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress LDAP Plugin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiralbound.net/2005/10/26/wordpress-ldap-plugin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiralbound.net/2005/10/26/wordpress-ldap-plugin</link>
	<description>my digital notebook</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://spiralbound.net/2005/10/26/wordpress-ldap-plugin#comment-29266</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiralbound.net/?p=110#comment-29266</guid>
		<description>What I want to do on my blog, is every few hours take the oldest post and move it to the 
front of the queue, all automatically. Anyone know if there is a plugin that can do this or 
a simple way to set up another plugin to do this (use my own feed perhaps)?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to do on my blog, is every few hours take the oldest post and move it to the<br />
front of the queue, all automatically. Anyone know if there is a plugin that can do this or<br />
a simple way to set up another plugin to do this (use my own feed perhaps)?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://spiralbound.net/2005/10/26/wordpress-ldap-plugin#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiralbound.net/?p=110#comment-357</guid>
		<description>Has there been any progress toward getting the LDAP plugin to work with Wordpress MU?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has there been any progress toward getting the LDAP plugin to work with Wordpress MU?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cliff</title>
		<link>http://spiralbound.net/2005/10/26/wordpress-ldap-plugin#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiralbound.net/?p=110#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Pat... I work at Plymouth State University, and we are investigating a blogging solution for about 13,000 users. There are very few that integrate with LDAP, so if we can get the plugin working with MU, it will tip the scales pretty heavily towards WordPress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Pat&#8230; I work at Plymouth State University, and we are investigating a blogging solution for about 13,000 users. There are very few that integrate with LDAP, so if we can get the plugin working with MU, it will tip the scales pretty heavily towards WordPress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Cavit</title>
		<link>http://spiralbound.net/2005/10/26/wordpress-ldap-plugin#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cavit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiralbound.net/?p=110#comment-188</guid>
		<description>That's pretty cool, but you may want to take a look at what Billy Gray's doing over at http://quicksilver.montclair.edu/blog/?p=527

I haven't had time to update that plugin for quite some time and it doesn't appear to be nearly as flexible as some folks need it to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty cool, but you may want to take a look at what Billy Gray&#8217;s doing over at <a href="http://quicksilver.montclair.edu/blog/?p=527" rel="nofollow">http://quicksilver.montclair.edu/blog/?p=527</a></p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had time to update that plugin for quite some time and it doesn&#8217;t appear to be nearly as flexible as some folks need it to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
