<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" >

<channel>
	<title>spiralbound.net &#187; shutter lag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiralbound.net/tag/shutter-lag/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiralbound.net</link>
	<description>my digital notebook</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:47:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus C7000 Housing</title>
		<link>http://spiralbound.net/2006/07/20/olympus-c7000-housing</link>
		<comments>http://spiralbound.net/2006/07/20/olympus-c7000-housing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7 megapixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c8080]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megapixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus c7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebreather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutter lag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[under water photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xd card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiralbound.net/2006/07/20/olympus-c7000-housing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that I needed any more reasons to love my Olympus C7000 but I have to say that I was pretty psyched when I realized that I could get this housing for it that is rated to 200 feet. Normally, when a person goes looking for a camera housing, he goes to backscatter or light [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I needed any <a href="http://spiralbound.net/2005/11/10/why-i-chose-the-olympus-c7000/">more reasons to love</a> my <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=as2&#038;path=ASIN/B0002ZUHB0&#038;tag=spiralbound05-20&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">Olympus C7000</a> but I have to say that I was pretty psyched when I realized that I could get <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=as2&#038;path=ASIN/B0009V3B42&#038;tag=spiralbound05-20&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">this housing</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=spiralbound05-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B0009V3B42" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> for it that is rated to 200 feet. Normally, when a person goes looking for a camera housing, he goes to <a href="http://backscatter.com/">backscatter</a> or <a href="http://uwimaging.com/">light and motion</a>, and ends up paying something like $1,000 just for the housing, but this sweet little rig can be had for less than $270!</p>
<p>It also has the added sweetness of not being too large, which is really nice when you have to manage a <a href="http://spiralbound.net/2005/12/29/rebreather-evaluation-part-1/">rebreather</a>, and complex dive profiles. I&#8217;ve never been much of an underwater photographer, but there has been countless times that I&#8217;ve wished I could take some simple snapshots of the things I&#8217;ve seen. As far as I can tell, this little housing do the trick nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://spiralbound.net/2006/07/20/olympus-c7000-housing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I Chose the Olympus C7000</title>
		<link>http://spiralbound.net/2005/11/10/why-i-chose-the-olympus-c7000</link>
		<comments>http://spiralbound.net/2005/11/10/why-i-chose-the-olympus-c7000#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data and Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7 megapixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c8080]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casey bisson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cropping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megapixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus c7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax optio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shutter lag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xd card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiralbound.net/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the past year or so, I have been using a Pentax Optio &#8220;S&#8221; series digital camera. For the most part, I have been quite happy with it, and while 4 megapixel is considered a bit on the low side by modern standards, I really had no intention of upgrading it because I liked it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the past year or so, I have been using a <a href="http://www.techdigest.tv/2004/11/pentax_optio_sv.html">Pentax Optio &#8220;S&#8221; series</a> digital camera. For the most part, I have been quite happy with it, and while 4 megapixel is considered a bit on the low side by modern standards, I really had no intention of upgrading it because I liked it&#8217;s small size, and the photos were generally quite good.</p>
<p>That is, until I had the chance to play with an <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?link_code=as2&#038;path=ASIN/B0002ZUHB0&#038;tag=spiralbound05-20&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">Olympus C7000</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=spiralbound05-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B0002ZUHB0" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />. While my complaints about the Optio were few, I had always wished that it did a better job of focusing in macro mode. I had tested other cameras for close focus, and had found none that would do a better job than mine, so I just assumed it was a limitation of the electronics, and accepted it. When I tested the C7000, however, I was amazed at how well it pulled focus in macro mode. Indeed, given decent lighting, it could focus nearly right on the glass, and the focus was amazingly fast.</p>
<p>The other thing about the C7000 that had me running to check my ATM balance was just how little shutter lag it had. Having gotten used to a fairly long delay with the Optio, the Olympus had me feeling like I was shooting film again. My arguments with <a href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10256/">Casey about how my Pentax was &#8220;just fine&#8221;</a> were quickly falling apart. I loved the Olympus. I wanted it, but I could not swing the $500 bucks, so I just kept on wanting it but shooting with my Pentax.</p>
<p>That is, however, until <a href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10849/">Casey bought one</a>. He was with me when I tested it, and apparently he was pretty impressed with it as well. He was not impressed enough though, and in short order offered me a great deal on it, so he <a href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10854/">could turn around and buy an Olympus C8080</a>. I handed him the cash and never looked back.</p>
<p>It is great in most light situations, and I continue to be impressed with the minimal shutter lag and amazing close focus. I&#8217;m not really sure that I need all seven megapixels though. I rarely need to do much cropping, but I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll be glad to have them when I do. The only thing I&#8217;m wishing for now is a bigger XD card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://spiralbound.net/2005/11/10/why-i-chose-the-olympus-c7000/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
